Electronic Telegram No. 952 Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION M.S. 18, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. IAUSUBS@CFA.HARVARD.EDU or FAX 617-495-7231 (subscriptions) CBAT@CFA.HARVARD.EDU (science) URL http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html COMET C/2006 WD4 (LEMMON) E. Guido and G. Sostero, Castellammare di Stabia, Italy, report that their remote CCD observations with a 0.15-m f/6 reflector at the Rent-a-Scope Observatory at Biggera Waters, Queensland, show the Mt. Lemmon discovery 2006 WD4 (cf. MPEC 2006-W61, MPC 189005; discovery observation below) to be a comet. The coaddition of eleven unfiltered 60-s exposures on Apr. 30.80 UT revealed the presence of a spiral-like symmetric coma, spanning almost 20 arcsec, from p.a. 240 deg to p.a. 30 deg (in a counterclockwise direction); the total mag was close to 14.2 and that of the condensation 15.3-15.4. The coaddition of nine similar exposures (but in less satisfactory conditions) on May 2.80 UT showed the presence of an elliptical coma measuring nearly 12 by 18 arcsec, the major axis tilted along a line close to p.a. 235 deg; the total mag was about 14.1 and that of the condensation 15.4. 2006 UT R.A. (2000) Decl. Mag. Nov. 20.32650 3 32 32.53 +28 02 22.0 20.3 The following orbital elements, together with the Apr. 30-May 2 astrometry, full residuals and an ephemeris, are given on MPEC 2007-J12. Epoch = 2007 Apr. 10.0 TT T = 2007 Apr. 28.3951 TT Peri. = 292.6928 e = 0.998994 Node = 226.7908 2000.0 q = 0.591207 AU Incl. = 152.7038 With reference to observations by F. Bernardi with the 2.24-m University of Hawaii reflector on 2006 Dec. 25.4 UT, D. J. Tholen wrote that, although the object appeared stellar to the eye, the CCD trail of 2006 WD4 was wider than the trails of two dozen stars nearby. In the second of the 600-s exposures the mean stellar trail width was 2.08 +/- 0.05 pixels (0.91 arcsec). That of 2006 WD4 (FWHM) was 2.3 pixels (1.01 arcsec), about 0.1 pixel wider than the widest of the stellar sources. The results were considered "sufficiently suspicious to warrant further observations as the object approaches the sun". NOTE: These 'Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams' are sometimes superseded by text appearing later in the printed IAU Circulars. (C) Copyright 2007 CBAT 2007 May 3 (CBET 952) Brian G. Marsden