Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams

Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams -- Image credits

IAUC 3665: COMETS HARTLEY (1982b, 1982c); 1982 BB

The following International Astronomical Union Circular may be linked-to from your own Web pages, but must not otherwise be redistributed (see these notes on the conditions under which circulars are made available on our WWW site).


Read IAUC 3664  SEARCH Read IAUC 3666
IAUC number


                                                  Circular No. 3665
Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams
INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION
Postal Address: Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
TWX 710-320-6842 ASTROGRAM CAM     Telephone 617-864-5758


COMETS HARTLEY (1982b, 1982c)
     Further computations by the undersigned have included attempts
to represent the observations of comet 1982c with orbits fitted to
the observations of comet 1982b and a change in perihelion time T.
The best representation comes from the orbit with e = 0.59 (cf. IAUC
3664) and T changed to 1982 Apr. 1.888 ET; residuals are ~ l" on
Feb. 5 and 6 but almost 15" (mainly in Decl.) on Feb. 7.  The resulting
ephemeris is Feb. 10, R.A. = 12h44m.3l, Decl. = - 9o00'.9; 15, 12h59m.72,
-11o26'.0; 20, 13h16m.29, -13o59'.6; 25, 13h34m.15, -16o40'.1; Mar. 2,
13h53m.38, -19o24'.6, with the comet brightening to m1 ~ 16.

     Z. Sekanina, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, remarks that it is
virtually certain that the two comets separated from a single object
and that, unless there was a significant separation velocity in the
orbit plane at the time of splitting, the primary (i.e., most massive)
component must in fact be the currently fainter comet 1982c;
he anticipates that comet 1982b will fade rapidly.  He confirms a
discordance in the observations of one of the comets on Feb. 7 and
suggests that separation occurred in late 1976.  The orbit with e =
0.59 indicates that the relative separation acceleration was 7 (+/- 4)
x 10**-5 units of solar attraction, and the results seem to be
substantially less satisfactory if e is assumed to be greater than 0.63.


1982 BB
     Precise positions obtained by J. Gibson at Palomar:

     1982 UT             R. A. (1950) Decl.
     Feb.  2.38615    10 35 34.92   +20 54 10.6
           3.30489    10 34 03.29   +21 33 22.0
           3.50975    10 33 41.20   +21 42 00.8

     Computations by the undersigned (using also the rough position
on IAUC 3660) show this to be an Apollo-type object (T = 1981 Sept.
24.1 ET, Peri. = 252o.7, Node = 130o.0, Incl. = 22o.5, q = 0.901 AU, e = 0.372).

     1982 ET     R. A. (1950) Decl.     Delta     r     Mag.
     Feb. 10    10 22.08    +26 02.4    0.561   1.533   15.9
          15    10 12.69    +28 57.9
          20    10 03.45    +31 26.9    0.616   1.581   16.2
          25     9 54.81    +33 28.0
     Mar.  2     9 47.18    +35 02.1    0.694   1.626   16.7


1982 February 11               (3665)              Brian G. Marsden

Read IAUC 3664  SEARCH Read IAUC 3666


Our Web policy. Index to the CBAT/MPC/ICQ pages.


Valid HTML 4.01!